© 2024 SDPB Radio
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Bill Failed To Boost Confidence In Fannie, Freddie

JACKI LYDEN, host:

For more on how the mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, got to this point, and where they're likely to go next, we turn to Jeffrey Birnbaum. He's the managing editor at the Washington Times. Thanks for joining us.

Mr. JEFFREY BIRNBAUM (Managing Editor, Washington Times): Thanks for having me.

LYDEN: Earlier this summer, Congress passed a legislation designed to boost confidence in Fannie and Freddie. How do we get from that legislation to this weekend's reports of a government takeover?

Mr. BIRNBAUM: Well, the legislation was not actually a bailout, as it was sometimes referred to. It was actually more of a backstop, an authority for the Treasury Department to step in if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed to do what they're supposed to do, which is to borrow a whole bunch of money in order to back the issuance of mortgages around the country.

And in the last few weeks, Freddie Mac, in particular, the smaller of the two companies, was having extra trouble raising that money because of lack of confidence by investors. And the Treasury Department apparently is worried that they might not be able to borrow a whole lot more. And they're now considering using that authority, that backstop authority, to inject cash into Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or both.

LYDEN: You've been talking to people in both the private and public sectors. How sure are they that the government can run Fannie and Freddie better than those companies' CEOs did?

Mr. BIRNBAUM: Well, there's a big debate on that subject. The companies have long argued that the government is not adequately staffed to manage the securitization of billions of dollars of mortgages. That is, making a market, a secondary market, in mortgages of the kind that we're now accustomed to.

In fact, because of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, we have 30-year fixed-rate mortgages - something the rest of the world doesn't. And these companies have really perfected the ability to find enough money to underwrite mortgages of this kind. The government really hasn't done that, and so the rescue plan that's being considered might fall short of an absolute takeover of the two companies because a lot of the expertise in securitizing those mortgages rests within those companies and not within the federal bureaucracy.

LYDEN: Jeffrey Birnbaum, you've reported a lot on the close relationship between Congress and the lobbyists in Fannie and Freddie. This deal must fundamentally change that relationship.

Mr. BIRNBAUM: Well, yes. I think that the lobbying of Fannie and Freddie, which once was legion, they were known as real powerhouses on Capitol Hill, has declined significantly as the fortunes of the two companies have also declined. But it is, I think, fair to say that this day of reckoning, if it in fact is coming, has been delayed because of the amount of pressure the two companies have put on Congress to keep hands off over the years.

And there will be a debate, I'm sure, whether too much pressure was applied and the public interest was put in jeopardy because of that pressure.

LYDEN: So, if the government intervention goes through, how can we tell whether it's working?

Mr. BIRNBAUM: Well, the markets will tell us whether the government action is working. We'll see whether investors will lend enough money and at reasonable rates to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We'll see if investors buy the company stock and whether the stock price goes up or down.

In any case, it's pretty clear that the government intends to do whatever it needs to do to make sure the mortgage markets operate because that's such a fundamentally important part of the financial markets around the world.

LYDEN: Jeffrey Birnbaum is a managing editor at the Washington Times. Thanks very much for talking with us.

Mr. BIRNBAUM: Thank you. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.